From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Praisner v. State

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 12, 2019
332 Conn. 905 (Conn. 2019)

Opinion

06-12-2019

Martin J. PRAISNER, Jr. v. STATE of Connecticut

D'AURIA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition. David C. Yale, in support of the petition. Emily V. Melendez, assistant attorney general, in opposition.


D'AURIA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

David C. Yale, in support of the petition.

Emily V. Melendez, assistant attorney general, in opposition.

The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 189 Conn. App. 540, 208 A.3d 667 (2019), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly hold that a university police officer is not a member of a ‘local police department’ entitled to indemnification under General Statutes § 53-39a ?"


Summaries of

Praisner v. State

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Jun 12, 2019
332 Conn. 905 (Conn. 2019)
Case details for

Praisner v. State

Case Details

Full title:Martin J. PRAISNER, Jr. v. STATE of Connecticut

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Jun 12, 2019

Citations

332 Conn. 905 (Conn. 2019)
208 A.3d 1239

Citing Cases

Praisner v. State

Thereafter, the plaintiff filed a petition for certification to appeal, which we granted, limited to the…