From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Polk v. Crockett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 28, 1980
379 So. 2d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Opinion

No. TT-187.

January 28, 1980.

Douglas Polk, pro se.

No appearance by respondent.


The Petition for Habeas Corpus asserts arbitrary and erroneous application of parole release guidelines. Factual matters are alleged, but no record is provided, nor does the petition show that administrative remedies under Section 947.173, Florida Statutes (1979), have been exhausted. The petition is denied. See Richmond v. Wainwright, 378 So.2d 890, 1979, and cases therein cited.

McCORD, LARRY G. SMITH and SHIVERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Polk v. Crockett

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 28, 1980
379 So. 2d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)
Case details for

Polk v. Crockett

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS POLK, PETITIONER, v. MAURICE CROCKETT, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 28, 1980

Citations

379 So. 2d 369 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Moore v. Dugger

son officials violated his constitutional due process rights by reclassifying his confinement status from the…

Boone v. Fla. Comm'n on Offender Review

He is thus prohibited from raising it here. See Riddell v. Fla. Dep't of Corrections, 538 So.2d 132, 133…