From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pizza v. Walter

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jul 24, 1997
346 Md. 315 (Md. 1997)

Summary

withdrawing by joint motion pursuant to settlement agreement

Summary of this case from Martin v. Dolet

Opinion

No. 48, September Term, 1996.

July 24, 1997.

Charles J. Muskin, Glen Burnie, for appellant.

C. Edward Hartman, II, Annapolis, for appellee.

Submitted to BELL, C.J., and RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, KARWACKI, RAKER and WILNER, JJ.


ORDER

The Court having considered the joint motion to withdraw the mandate in the above captioned case, it is this 24th day of July, 1997,

ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, a majority of the Court concurring, that the motion be, and it is hereby, granted and the mandate is withdrawn, and it is further

ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, vacated, and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to vacate the judgment of the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County and to remand the case to that court for further proceedings in light of the settlement agreement between the parties. Mandate to issue forthwith.

ELDRIDGE, J., did not participate in the consideration of this matter.


Summaries of

Pizza v. Walter

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jul 24, 1997
346 Md. 315 (Md. 1997)

withdrawing by joint motion pursuant to settlement agreement

Summary of this case from Martin v. Dolet
Case details for

Pizza v. Walter

Case Details

Full title:EVELYN L. PIZZA, v. STEPHANIE J. WALTER

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jul 24, 1997

Citations

346 Md. 315 (Md. 1997)
697 A.2d 82

Citing Cases

Martin v. Dolet

Indeed, now that the property has been sold, "a reversal on appeal would have no effect." See Baltrotsky v.…

Greenwood v. Huffman

The general rule is that "the rights of a bona fide purchaser of mortgaged property would not be affected by…