From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pinner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A
Mar 20, 2008
No. 07-08-0108-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-08-0108-CR

March 20, 2008. DO NOT PUBLISH

Appealed from the 154th District Court of Lamb County; No. 3748; Honorable Felix Klein, Judge.

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.


ABATEMENT AND REMAND


Following a plea of not guilty, appellant Carl Pinner was convicted by jury of aggravated sexual assault and sentenced to life imprisonment. While orally announcing intent to appeal, appellant's trial counsel failed to timely file a written notice of appeal on appellant's behalf prior to withdrawing from representation. On appellant's application for writ of habeas corpus, the Court of Criminal Appeals granted him the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal. Ex parte Carl Pinner, No. AP-75, 802 (Tex.Crim.App. December 5, 2007) (per curiam) (not designated for publication). Appellant then timely filed his notice of appeal. The clerk's record filed on March 10, 2008 contains the Trial Court's Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal. The certification form, however, is not signed by appellant as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), nor does it contain the required admonitions of appellant's rights. The trial court certification is required even when the Court of Criminal Appeals grants an out-of-time appeal. Odneal v. State, 161 S.W.3d 692, 694 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 2005, pet. ref'd) (viewing the Court's habeas corpus relief as "turning the clock back" to the day of conviction, and providing appellant the opportunity to timely file notice of appeal, "at which point the requirements of the Rules of Appellate Procedure come into effect"). Consequently, we abate this appeal and remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. On remand, the trial court shall utilize whatever means necessary to secure a Certification of Defendant's Right of Appeal in compliance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), as presently in effect. This action is to be taken not later than April 21, 2008. Once properly executed, the certification shall be included in a supplemental clerk's record and filed with this Court on or before May 1, 2008. It is so ordered.

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d) was amended, effective September1, 2007, to require that the defendant sign the certification and receive a copy. By signingthe amended certification, an appellant also acknowledges he has been advised of certainrights concerning appeal.

The Court of Criminal Appeals' opinion granting appellant habeas corpus reliefcontains language very similar to that quoted from the Court of Criminal Appeals' habeascorpus opinion in Odneal, 161 S.W.3d at 694. In appellant's case, the Court of CriminalAppeals said, "[Appellant] is ordered returned to that time at which he may give a writtennotice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaningful appeal.All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date onwhich the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should [appellant] desire toprosecute an appeal, he must take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in thetrial court within 30 days after the mandate of this Court issues."


Summaries of

Pinner v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A
Mar 20, 2008
No. 07-08-0108-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2008)
Case details for

Pinner v. State

Case Details

Full title:CARL PINNER, APPELLANT v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Seventh District, Amarillo, Panel A

Date published: Mar 20, 2008

Citations

No. 07-08-0108-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 20, 2008)