From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pilgrim v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 12, 2001
01 Civ. 7371 (KMW) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2001)

Opinion

01 Civ. 7371 (KMW) (AJP)

October 12, 2001


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


To the Honorable Kimba M. Wood, United States District Judge:

Plaintiff Linda Pilgrim's complaint in this Social Security action states that she lives in Brooklyn, New York. Appeals from decisions of the Social Security Administration are to be brought in the District where the plaintiff resides. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Accordingly, I recommend that the action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York.

The Court also notes that the Appeals Council letter is dated April 6, 2001 and plaintiff states that she received it on April 12, 2001. (Dkt. No. 1: Compl. ¶ 8.) Pilgrim's federal complaint is dated July 4, 2001 and was received by the Court's Pro Se Office on July 5, 2001 — more than 60 days after the Appeals Council's April letter. The issue of the untimeliness of plaintiff's complaint, or whether plaintiff is entitled to any equitable toll of the period for filing her complaint, should be addressed in the Eastern District.

FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO THIS REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the parties shall have ten (10) days from service of this Report to file written objections. See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 6. Such objections (and any responses to objections) shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court, with courtesy copies delivered to the chambers of the Honorable Kimba M. Wood, 500 Pearl Street, Room 1610, and to my chambers, 500 Pearl Street, Room 1370. Any requests for an extension of time for filing objections must be directed to Judge Wood. Failure to file objections will result in a waiver of those objections for purposes of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 106 S.Ct. 466 (1985); IUE AFL-CIO Pension Fund v. Herrmann, 9 F.3d 1049, 1054 (2d Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 822, 115 S.Ct. 86 (1994); Roldan v. Racette, 984 F.2d 85, 89 (2d Cir. 1993); Frank v. Johnson, 968 F.2d 298, 300 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1038, 113 S.Ct. 825 (1992); Small v. Secretary of Health Human Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989); Wesolek v. Canadair Ltd., 838 F.2d 55, 57-59 (2d Cir. 1988); McCarthy v. Manson, 714 F.2d 234, 237-38 (2d Cir. 1983); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72, 6(a), 6(e).


Summaries of

Pilgrim v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 12, 2001
01 Civ. 7371 (KMW) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2001)
Case details for

Pilgrim v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:Linda Pilgrim, Plaintiff, v. Commissioner Of Social Security, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 12, 2001

Citations

01 Civ. 7371 (KMW) (AJP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2001)

Citing Cases

VAZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Accordingly, I recommend that the action be transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern…

Nunez v. Kijakazi

In view of Plaintiff's residence and the clear provisions of the Act, the instant action must be transferred…