From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pike v. City of Stuttgart

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jul 8, 1940
200 Ark. 1010 (Ark. 1940)

Opinion

No. 4-6018

Opinion delivered July 8, 1940.

1. MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS — ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY. — Section 5901 of Pope's Digest, which refers to 9786 — 9788, provides for annexation of territory by municipal corporations and allows remonstrances to be filed by affected parties. There is nothing in these statutory provisions abridging the general law governing the time within which transcripts must be filed in circuit court in order to perfect an appeal from the county court. Held, that the transcripts mentioned in 9788, et seq., are the records directed to be delivered to the county recorder. The requirements there set out relate to independent proceedings. 2. COURTS — TIME FOR APPEALS. — The General Assembly may limit the time for appeals from the county court to the circuit court and designate, within reason, when the record shall be lodged with the clerk of the circuit court. 3. COURTS — APPEALS. — under the statutes allowing six months for appeal, it is not required that the transcript be lodged with the circuit court within 30 days. Pope's Dig., 2913-2917.

Appeal from Arkansas Circuit Court, Northern District; W. J. Waggoner, Judge; reversed.

W.A. Leach, for appellant.

Wm. C. Gibson and M. F. Elms, for appellee.


The city of Stuttgart initiated proceedings to annex certain territory. Appellants, in the county court, protested annexation. The complaint was dismissed June 15, 1939. Within thirty days one of the appellants filed affidavit and prayer for appeal. The appeal was granted. Transcript was lodged with the circuit clerk August 4, 1939.

Pope's Digest, 9501, 9502, 9786, 9787, and 9788.

The city moved to dismiss, insisting that the applicable statute required filing of the transcript within thirty days. Facts were stipulated. The court ruled with the city. This appeal is from the order directing that the appeal be dismissed.

Appellee maintains that an appeal from the county court's final order is regulated by 9501 of the Digest, which provides that if a majority of the votes cast on the proposal for annexation are favorable, the corporation shall present to the county court a petition praying for annexation, and: "The like proceeding shall be had on said petition as is prescribed in 9786-9788, so far as the same may be applicable, and if, within thirty days after a transcript shall be delivered as provided, no notice of a complaint against such annexation shall be given at the end of said thirty days (and in case of any such complaint, then after the end of thirty days after the dismissal of said complaint), the territory shall, in law, be deemed and taken to be included in and shall be a part of said corporation."

Since 9501 refers to 9786-9788 for guidance as to procedure insofar as such sections are applicable, we must determine whether expressly or by necessary implication appeals are regulated.

Article 7, 33, of the Constitution, allows appeals to the circuit court from all judgments of the county court, "to be taken under such restrictions and regulations as may be prescribed by law."

The general statute adopted pursuant to the constitutional authority appears as 2913, et seq., of Pope's Digest. Appeals may be prosecuted at any time within six months "after a final order or judgment of the county court has been made or rendered." By 2915 it is directed that the clerk of the county court transmit to the clerk of the circuit court ". . . all of the original papers and a transcript of the record entry in the cause or matter." When this is done the controversy stands for trial at the succeeding term of circuit court if the appeal is granted ten days before circuit court convenes.

We think the statutory provisions relating to annexation of territory at the instance of agents of an existing corporation were intended to afford a right of action to parties claiming to be affected, but such action is an independent proceeding, as distinguished from appeal. The transcripts mentioned in 9788, et seq., are the records required to be delivered to the county recorder, and in turn certified. There is no requirement that a transcript, such as that upon which an appeal may be predicated, shall be filed with the circuit clerk within thirty days. The General Assembly has the right to limit time for appeals, and to designate, within reason, when the record should be completed and lodged with the circuit court.

Authority for the procedure adopted by appellee is found in 35, 36, 37, 84, and 85 of the act of March 9, 1875, now appearing as 9501-2, 9786-7-8, of Pope's Digest. The general statute authorizing appeals from the county court includes 1 to 5 of the act of February 20, 1883, shown in Pope's Digest as 2913 to 2917. The enactment of 1883 expressly allows six months for appeals, and does not require that transcripts be lodged with the circuit court within thirty days.

Briner v. Holleman, 115 Ark. 213, 170 S.W. 1010; Smith Shoptaw v. Stanton, 187 Ark. 447, 60 S.W.2d 183.

Our view is that appellants here filed their transcripts in ample time, and that the appeal was improperly dismissed. The judgment is reversed, with directions that the cause be reinstated.


Summaries of

Pike v. City of Stuttgart

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Jul 8, 1940
200 Ark. 1010 (Ark. 1940)
Case details for

Pike v. City of Stuttgart

Case Details

Full title:PIKE v. CITY OF STUTTGART

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Jul 8, 1940

Citations

200 Ark. 1010 (Ark. 1940)
142 S.W.2d 233

Citing Cases

Skinner v. City of Eldorado

There remains the timeliness of the appellees' appeal to the circuit court. The original county court order…

Campbell v. City of Cherokee Village West

Here, we are not presented with a situation involving an appeal from the county court. Instead, we conclude…