From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Phillipps v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 2011
83 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

No. 4769.

April 12, 2011.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol E. Huff, J.), entered July 9, 2010, upon a jury verdict awarding plaintiff $300,000 for past pain and suffering and $300,000 for future pain and suffering, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellants.

Alan M. Greenberg, P.C., Garden City (Lisa M. Comeau of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Gonzalez, P.J., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Renwick and Richter, JJ.


The verdict was not contrary to the weight of the evidence adduced at trial ( see Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493). In light of the unrefuted testimony of plaintiffs medical expert that a medical record entry, reflecting plaintiffs statement to hospital personnel that his injuries occurred when he fell on his back due to a sudden, violent movement of a bus he was exiting, was relevant to diagnosis and treatment, it was a proper exercise of discretion for the court to allow the entry into evidence ( see People v Ortega, 15 NY3d 610).

Defendants' claim that plaintiffs testimony failed to establish a prima facie case of negligence is not preserved for appellate review, since they failed to move for a directed verdict at trial ( see Rodgers v 72nd St. Assoc., 269 AD2d 258, 259). In any event, plaintiffs description of the incident and the nature of his injuries was sufficient to satisfy the requirement of showing that the bus's departure caused a jerk or lurch that was unusual and violent ( see DiSalvatore v New York City Tr. Auth., 45 AD3d 402; Fonseca v Manhattan Bronx Surface Tr. Operating Auth., 14 AD3d 397).

The damages awarded do not materially deviate from what would be reasonable compensation under the circumstances (CPLR 5501 [c]; see e.g. Morales v Heron, 250 AD2d 408).


Summaries of

Phillipps v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 2011
83 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Phillipps v. New York City Transit Authority

Case Details

Full title:GERALD PHILLIPPS, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 12, 2011

Citations

83 A.D.3d 473 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 2923
922 N.Y.S.2d 286

Citing Cases

Weston v. Castro

In view of the discrepancies in defendant's own testimony with respect to the details of the accident, the…

State v. David S.

Respondent failed to preserve his remaining claims that the trial evidence was legally insufficient to…