From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Morales v. Heron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1998
250 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

May 12, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lottie Wilkins, J.).


Plaintiff, while a passenger in defendant Robert Heron's car, suffered two fractured ribs, a bruised kidney and bladder, and facial scarring requiring 50 stitches, when Heron's car crossed over into the opposite lane of traffic and collided head on with defendant Tetro's van. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was not wearing a seat belt even though one was available. We agree with the trial court that, contrary to defendants-appellant's argument, the jury's determination that Tetro was 25% responsible for the accident was not contrary to the weight of the evidence; the evidence evidently credited by the jury indicated that Tetro had had a chance to avoid Heron's vehicle. However, given the injuries sustained by plaintiff, we find the trial, court's reduction of the damages awarded by the jury for pain and suffering to have been excessive and to lack support in the record.

Concur — Rosenberger J.P., Rubin, Williams, Tom and Saxe, JJ.


Summaries of

Morales v. Heron

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 12, 1998
250 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Morales v. Heron

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH MORALES, Appellant-Respondent, v. ROBERT R. HERON, Defendant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 12, 1998

Citations

250 A.D.2d 408 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
673 N.Y.S.2d 88

Citing Cases

Phillipps v. New York City Transit Authority

In any event, plaintiffs description of the incident and the nature of his injuries was sufficient to satisfy…

Nash v. Equities

; in the event that the plaintiff John Barry Nash so stipulates, then the judgment, as so reduced and…