From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Petrosino v. Petrosino

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 24, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

2019–14223 Index No. F–07501–14/18C

03-24-2021

In the Matter of Robert PETROSINO, appellant, v. Heidi PETROSINO, respondent.

Robert Petrosino, Katonah, NY, appellant pro se. Wexler Law Group PLLC, Mamaroneck, N.Y. (Arlene Gold Wexler of counsel), for respondent.


Robert Petrosino, Katonah, NY, appellant pro se.

Wexler Law Group PLLC, Mamaroneck, N.Y. (Arlene Gold Wexler of counsel), for respondent.

CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, ROBERT J. MILLER, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Nilda Morales Horowitz, J.), entered November 14, 2019. The order denied the father's objections to an order of the same court (Rosa Cabanillas–Thompson, S.M.) dated July 5, 2019, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed the father to pay child support in the sum of $4,841 per month.

ORDERED that the appeal from the order entered November 14, 2019, is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An appellant is obligated to assemble a proper record on appeal, which must include any relevant transcripts of proceedings before the hearing court or trial court (see CPLR 5525 ; Matter of Leacock v. Muhammad, 165 A.D.3d 942, 942, 83 N.Y.S.3d 907 ; Matter of Butti v. Butti, 92 A.D.3d 781, 782, 938 N.Y.S.2d 458 ; Matter of Howard v. Springer, 41 A.D.3d 848, 848, 837 N.Y.S.2d 574 ). Here, the appellant's failure to provide this Court with the transcripts of the Family Court hearing renders the record on appeal inadequate to enable this Court to reach an informed determination on the merits. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Leacock v. Muhammad, 165 A.D.3d at 942, 83 N.Y.S.3d 907 ; Matter of Butti v. Butti, 92 A.D.3d at 782, 938 N.Y.S.2d 458 ; Matter of Howard v. Springer, 41 A.D.3d at 848, 837 N.Y.S.2d 574 ).

CHAMBERS, J.P., AUSTIN, MILLER and WOOTEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Petrosino v. Petrosino

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
Mar 24, 2021
192 A.D.3d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

Petrosino v. Petrosino

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Robert Petrosino, appellant, v. Heidi Petrosino…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department

Date published: Mar 24, 2021

Citations

192 A.D.3d 1037 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
2021 N.Y. Slip Op. 1779
140 N.Y.S.3d 760

Citing Cases

Camarda v. Charlot

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements. An appellant is obligated to assemble a…

Orok-Edem v. Wondemagegehu

Here, the father's failure to provide this Court with the exhibits admitted into evidence at the Family Court…