From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Orok-Edem v. Wondemagegehu

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 15, 2023
221 A.D.3d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)

Opinion

2023–02512 Docket Nos. F–1144–19/19A, F–1144–19/19B

11-15-2023

In the Matter of Edmund OROK–EDEM, appellant, v. Kidist WONDEMAGEGEHU, respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Kidist Wondemagegehu, respondent, v. Edmund Orok–Edem, appellant. (Proceeding No. 2)

Da'Tekena Barango–Tariah, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant. Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Robert Beau Kellogg of counsel), for respondent.


Da'Tekena Barango–Tariah, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.

Twyla Carter, New York, NY (Robert Beau Kellogg of counsel), for respondent.

VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, LILLIAN WAN, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In related proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Alison M. Hamanjian, J.), dated February 14, 2023. The order, in effect, denied the father's objections to (1) an order of the same court (Marjorie R. Steinberg, S.M.) dated September 14, 2022, which, after a hearing, granted the mother's petition to enforce the provisions of the parties' judgment of divorce awarding her child support and maintenance, and (2) an order of the same court (Marjorie R. Steinberg, S.M.) dated September 28, 2022, which, after a hearing, directed the father to pay child support in the amount of $1,713 per month.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal (see CPLR 5525 ; Matter of Camarda v. Charlot, 208 A.D.3d 1323, 1323–1324, 174 N.Y.S.3d 282 ). Here, the father's failure to provide this Court with the exhibits admitted into evidence at the Family Court hearing renders the record on appeal inadequate to enable this Court to reach an informed determination on the merits. Accordingly, the appeal must be dismissed (see Matter of Camarda v. Charlot, 208 A.D.3d at 1323–1324, 174 N.Y.S.3d 282 ; Matter of Petrosino v. Petrosino, 192 A.D.3d 1037, 1037, 140 N.Y.S.3d 760 ; Matter of Gupta v. Kumar, 146 A.D.3d 886, 886, 44 N.Y.S.3d 766 ).

BRATHWAITE NELSON, J.P., CHAMBERS, DOWLING and WAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Orok-Edem v. Wondemagegehu

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 15, 2023
221 A.D.3d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
Case details for

Orok-Edem v. Wondemagegehu

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Edmund Orok-Edem, appellant, v. Kidist Wondemagegehu…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 15, 2023

Citations

221 A.D.3d 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 2023)
2023 N.Y. Slip Op. 5733
198 N.Y.S.3d 762

Citing Cases

Javaherforoush v. Hawkins

Here, the record on appeal assembled by the defendants failed to include any exhibits from the second trial,…