Summary
holding that county ordinance imposing fees for background checks on sales of firearms was not preempted by state law
Summary of this case from Shevtsov v. Multnomah Cnty. AssessorOpinion
1994.
holding that county ordinance imposing fees for background checks on sales of firearms was not preempted by state law
Summary of this case from Shevtsov v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessor1994.
holding that county ordinance imposing fees for background checks on sales of firearms was not preempted by state law
Summary of this case from Shevtsov v. Multnomah Cnty. Assessorapplying ORS 12.110 to a claim that the defendant misrepresented the zoning of the property and whether it could be subdivided
Summary of this case from Riverview Condo. Ass'n, an Or. Non-Profit Corp. v. Cypress Ventures, Inc.describing types of constitutionally unprotected arms
Summary of this case from State v. ChristianFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1994
However, counties, unlike administrative agencies, have the power to exercise legislative authority as…
Washington Cty. Police Officers v. Wash. CtyReversed and remanded for reconsideration April 20, 1994. Employment Relations Board's petition for review…