concluding that, "with the enactment of ORS 137.123, the legislature intended to eliminate any ‘inherent authority’ that the court might have with respect to [imposing] consecutive sentences"
Summary of this case from State v. Link1997.
concluding that, "with the enactment of ORS 137.123, the legislature intended to eliminate any ‘inherent authority’ that the court might have with respect to [imposing] consecutive sentences"
Summary of this case from State v. Linkexamining the juvenile code, as context, in determining whether a juvenile adjudication was a "sentence" for purposes of ORS 137.123
Summary of this case from State v. ThompsonFull title:PETITIONS FOR REVIEW
Court:Oregon Supreme Court
Date published: Jan 1, 1997
Nor, moreover, are juvenile dispositions the legal equivalent of criminal sentences. State ex rel Juv. Dept.…
Weidner v. ArmenakisThat volume contains no reference to a psychological diagnosis of "severe emotional disturbance." We do not…