Summary
holding the circumstantial evidence convicting defendant of uttering a forged check was sufficient to allow a reasonable jury to find defendant guilty
Summary of this case from State v. HurstOpinion
1986
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
316 N.C. 735 (N.C. 1986)
Summaries of
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 1, 1986
316 N.C. 735 (N.C. 1986)
holding the circumstantial evidence convicting defendant of uttering a forged check was sufficient to allow a reasonable jury to find defendant guilty
Summary of this case from State v. HurstCase details for
Petitions for Discretionary Review
Case Details
Full title:PETITIONS FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Jan 1, 1986
Citations
316 N.C. 735 (N.C. 1986)
Citing Cases
State v. Simpson
[11] The essential elements of uttering a forged endorsement are therefore that (1) the defendant "passed a…
State v. O'LearyTo convict a defendant of uttering a check with a forged endorsement, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-120 (2001), the…