From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Vintis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1998
249 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

April 27, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, with costs, and a new trial is granted on the issue of damages only unless, within 30 days after service upon the plaintiff of a copy of this decision and order with notice of entry, the plaintiff shall serve and file in the office of the Clerk of the Supreme Court, Kings County, a written stipulation consenting to decrease the verdict as to damages for (1) past pain and suffering from the sum of $200,000 to the sum of $75,000, and (2) future pain and suffering from the sum of $200,000 to the sum of $150,000, and to the entry of an amended judgment in the principal sum of $225,000; in the event that the plaintiff so stipulates, then the judgment, as so decreased and amended, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of an appropriate amended judgment.

The award of $200,000 for past pain and suffering and $200,000 for future pain and suffering materially deviates from what would be reasonable compensation to the extent indicated (see, CPLR 5501 [c]; see generally, Walsh v. Kings Plaza Replacement Serv., 239 A.D.2d 408; Fields v. Armada Vehicle Rental Co., 215 A.D.2d 433, 434; Peck v. Tired Iron Transp., 209 A.D.2d 979, 980; Wendell v. Supermarkets Gen. Corp., 189 A.D.2d 1063, 1065).

The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit or do not require reversal.

Bracken, J.P., Thompson, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perez v. Vintis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 27, 1998
249 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Perez v. Vintis

Case Details

Full title:JORGE PEREZ, Respondent, v. CHARLES VINTIS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 27, 1998

Citations

249 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
671 N.Y.S.2d 356

Citing Cases

Porcano v. Lehman

Nevertheless, the error does not warrant reversal under the circumstances. The evidence presented adequately…

Butler v. Merrolo

of comparing damage awards in different cases, particularly since the Court is without access to the full…