From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peralta v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2009
No. CIV S-09-3228 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-3228 GGH P.

December 8, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(a). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity either to submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing fee.

On November 19, 2009, plaintiff filed a letter with the court stating that he has already filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis in CIV S-09-2953 DAD P. Plaintiff is informed that he is required to file a separate in forma pauperis application for the instant action.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff shall submit, within thirty days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of this action; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.


Summaries of

Peralta v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 8, 2009
No. CIV S-09-3228 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2009)
Case details for

Peralta v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:CION PERALTA, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 8, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-09-3228 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 8, 2009)