PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 29, 1987

85 Or. App. 221 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

85 Or. App. 221

Opinion

735 P.2d 1304 (Or.App. 1987) 85 Or.App. 221 STATE of Oregon, ex rel. ADULT AND FAMILY SERVICES DIVISION, Appellant, v. Ronald S. TUTTLE, Respondent. D8507-65133; CA A40369. Court of Appeals of Oregon. April 29, 1987

       Argued and Submitted April 15, 1987.

        Reconsideration Denied June 12, 1987.

       John A. Reuling, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, for appellant. With him on brief, were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

       Lawrence D. Gorin, Portland, for appellant. With him on brief, was Keller, Gottliebs&sGorin, Portland.

       Before WARDEN, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

       PER CURIAM.

       Reversed and remanded. State ex rel. Adults&sFam. Ser. v. Bradley, 295 Or. 216, 666 P.2d 249 (1983); State ex rel. AFSD v. Keusink, 69 Or.App. 324, 684 P.2d 1239, rev. den. 298 Or. 278, 691 P.2d 482 (1984).