From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 6, 1985
72 Or. App. 186 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion


694 P.2d 997 (Or.App. 1985) 72 Or.App. 186 In the Matter of the Compensation of Richard Earl Gatchell, a beneficiary of William E. Caldwell, Claimant (Deceased). STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. Richard Earl GATCHELL, a beneficiary of William E. Caldwell, (Deceased), Respondent. 82-06349; CA A30533. Court of Appeals of Oregon. February 6, 1985

       Argued and Submitted July 18, 1984.

       Darrell E. Bewley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause, for petitioner. With him on brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

       Richard T. Kropp, Albany, argued the cause, for respondent. With him on brief were Emmons, Kyle, Kropp, Krygers&sAlexander, P.C., Albany.

       Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARDEN and NEWMAN, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Affirmed. Amos v. SAIF, 72 Or.App. 145, 694 P.2d 998 (decided this date).


Summaries of

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Oregon Court of Appeals
Feb 6, 1985
72 Or. App. 186 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Case Details

Full title:PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 6, 1985

Citations

72 Or. App. 186 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
72 Or. App. 186

Citing Cases

Rajneesh Medical Corp. v. Wasco County

The Court of Appeals affirmed per curiam. 72 Or. App. 186, 694 P.2d 997 (1985). In Perkins v. City of…