From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Woods

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 13, 2014
120 A.D.3d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-08-13

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Roger WOODS, appellant.

Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kendra L. Hutchinson of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky, and Marie John–Drigo of counsel), for respondent.


Lynn W.L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Kendra L. Hutchinson of counsel), for appellant. Kenneth P. Thompson, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky, and Marie John–Drigo of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (McKay, J.), dated June 30, 2011, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate a judgment of conviction of the same court rendered October 18, 2005, convicting him of murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court should have held a hearing on his claim, raised in his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate his judgment of conviction, that he is “actually innocent” of murder in the second degree. “A prima facie showing of actual innocence [requiring a hearing] is made out when there is ‘a sufficient showing of possible merit to warrant a fuller exploration’ by the court” ( People v. Hamilton, 115 A.D.3d 12, 27, 979 N.Y.S.2d 97; quoting Goldblum v. Klem, 510 F.3d 204, 219 [3d Cir.2007] ). Here, the defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of actual innocence sufficient to warrant a hearing ( see People v. Caldavado, 116 A.D.3d 877, 983 N.Y.S.2d 410;cf. People v. Hamilton, 115 A.D.3d at 27, 979 N.Y.S.2d 97).

Contrary to the defendant's contention, also raised on his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10, he was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel under either the New York Constitution or the United States Constitution ( see Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674;People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584).

Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied, without a hearing, the defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate his judgment of conviction. RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Woods

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Aug 13, 2014
120 A.D.3d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

People v. Woods

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Roger WOODS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Aug 13, 2014

Citations

120 A.D.3d 595 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 5812
990 N.Y.S.2d 827

Citing Cases

People v. Turner

A prima facie showing is made when, as here, there is a sufficient showing of possible merit to warrant a…

People v. Jones

Criminal Procedure Law § 440.30(4)(a) provides, in pertinent part, that “upon considering the merits of [a…