From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
272 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

May 10, 2000.

Appeal from Judgment of Genesee county Court, Noonan, J. — Attempted Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.

Before: Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.


Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed in accordance with the following Memorandum:

County Court erred in imposing a 10% surcharge on the restitution ordered for funds expended for the purchase of controlled substances from defendant ( see, Penal Law § 60.27; People v. Majestic, 270 A.D.2d 884). We therefore modify the judgment by vacating that surcharge. Contrary to defendant's contention, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 10, 2000
272 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ROB…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 10, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 990 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
708 N.Y.S.2d 670

Citing Cases

People v. Diallo

On the other hand, County Court may not impose a surcharge when restitution is to be paid to a law…

People v. Diallo

On the other hand, County Court may not impose a surcharge when restitution is to be paid to a law…