From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1991
175 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

July 22, 1991

Appeal from the County Court, Nassau County (Goodman, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the County Court erred by denying his request for an instruction on the defense of agency (see, People v Roche, 45 N.Y.2d 78, cert denied 436 U.S. 958; People v Lam Lek Chong, 45 N.Y.2d 64, 75, cert denied 439 U.S. 935) is without merit. Although an undercover officer initiated the transaction by inquiring of the defendant as to whether he had any drugs, the defendant both vouched for the quality of his product and directed a cohort to turn over the drugs and accept the money (see, People v Perez, 154 A.D.2d 628; People v Quinones, 150 A.D.2d 399). There is thus no evidence which suggests that the defendant was a mere instrumentality of the undercover officer (see, People v Argibay, 45 N.Y.2d 45, 54, cert denied sub nom. Hahn-DiGuiseppe v New York, 439 U.S. 930; People v Carter, 151 A.D.2d 688; People v Linden, 150 A.D.2d 801).

Also without merit is the defendant's claim that he was denied a fair trial because of alleged attempts by the prosecutor on summation to instruct the jury on the law. The defense counsel's objections to the two instances cited were immediately sustained, the alleged attempts were unsuccessful, and defendant made no request for curative instructions or any other relief. We conclude that the alleged errors were corrected to the defendant's satisfaction (see, People v Santiago, 52 N.Y.2d 865; People v Reid, 140 A.D.2d 639, 640-641; see also, People v Carter, supra). Further, there are no circumstances which suggest that defendant's concurrent terms of 6 to 12 years imprisonment, which were far less than the maximum which could be imposed (see, Penal Law § 70.06), constituted a penalty for exercising his right to proceed to trial (see, People v Pena, 50 N.Y.2d 400, 411-412, cert denied 449 U.S. 1087; People v Reid, supra, at 641), and we conclude that the sentences imposed were neither harsh nor excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Thompson, J.P., Bracken, Harwood and Balletta, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Williams

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 22, 1991
175 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLTON WILLIAMS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 22, 1991

Citations

175 A.D.2d 273 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
572 N.Y.S.2d 726

Citing Cases

People v. McVey

The defendant contends that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel because his counsel failed to…

People v. Kresberg

The defendant's contention that he was deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor's conduct during…