From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wilcox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1984
106 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

December 17, 1984

Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.).


Sentence affirmed.

On this record, defendant presents no evidence of either broken promises or prosecutorial misconduct on the part of the District Attorney (see People v. Royster, 104 A.D.2d 1011). Further, as defendant's contentions include matters which are dehors the record, they may not be considered by this court on direct appeal (see People v. Roberts, 89 A.D.2d 912; People v. Johnson, 73 A.D.2d 652). In any event, defendant's assertions of prosecutorial misconduct are beyond the scope of this appeal, which is limited to a review of the "legality, propriety or excessiveness of the sentence imposed" ( 22 NYCRR 670.17 [i]; People v. Johnson, supra). Mollen, P.J., Titone, Thompson and Boyers, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Wilcox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 17, 1984
106 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Wilcox

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. DONALD WILCOX…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 17, 1984

Citations

106 A.D.2d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Mosca

The first is that newly discovered evidence requires that he be granted a new trial and the second is that he…

People v. Cooper

Therefore, even though the People failed to raise this issue, the purported appeal from this order must be…