From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Royster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 1984
104 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

October 22, 1984

Appeal from the County Court, Rockland County (Edelstein, J.).


Resentence affirmed.

Defendant presents no evidence of any broken promises on the part of the District Attorney nor any prosecutorial misconduct during the plea negotiations sufficient to warrant vacatur of his resentence (see People v Eason, 40 N.Y.2d 297; People v David, 102 A.D.2d 551; People v Loebl, 77 A.D.2d 949). Defendant's constitutional claims are without merit (see People v Broadie, 37 N.Y.2d 100, cert. den. 423 U.S. 950). Titone, J.P., Bracken, Boyers and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Royster

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 22, 1984
104 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

People v. Royster

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. LEON ROYSTER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 22, 1984

Citations

104 A.D.2d 1011 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

People v. Wilcox

Sentence affirmed. On this record, defendant presents no evidence of either broken promises or prosecutorial…

People v. Boone

The defendant's new arguments regarding alleged prosecutorial misconduct during summation and those relating…