From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Wester

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 12, 2021
199 A.D.3d 1404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)

Opinion

993 KA 19-01446

11-12-2021

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert WESTER, Defendant-Appellant.

TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (TIMOTHY S. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.


TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (TIMOTHY S. DAVIS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ROCHESTER (NANCY GILLIGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, TROUTMAN, WINSLOW, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: On appeal from an order determining that he is a level two risk pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act ( Correction Law § 168 et seq. ), defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his request for a downward departure from his presumptive risk level because he met his burden of proving the existence of a mitigating factor to warrant the downward departure, i.e., he had an exceptional response to treatment. We reject that contention. While defendant is correct that "[a]n offender's response to treatment, if exceptional, can be the basis for a downward departure" (Sex Offender Registration Act: Risk Assessment Guidelines and Commentary at 17 [2006]), we conclude that defendant failed to meet his burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that his response was exceptional (see People v. Antonetti , 188 A.D.3d 1630, 1631, 134 N.Y.S.3d 601 [4th Dept. 2020], lv denied 36 N.Y.3d 910, 2021 WL 1217106 [2021] ; People v. Rivera , 144 A.D.3d 1595, 1596, 40 N.Y.S.3d 687 [4th Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 915, 2017 WL 582073 [2017] ). Moreover, even assuming, arguendo, that defendant demonstrated that his response to treatment was exceptional, we nevertheless conclude, based upon the totality of the circumstances, that a downward departure is not warranted (see Antonetti , 188 A.D.3d at 1632, 134 N.Y.S.3d 601 ; Rivera , 144 A.D.3d at 1596, 40 N.Y.S.3d 687 ; see generally People v. Gillotti , 23 N.Y.3d 841, 861, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ).


Summaries of

People v. Wester

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Nov 12, 2021
199 A.D.3d 1404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
Case details for

People v. Wester

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert WESTER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 12, 2021

Citations

199 A.D.3d 1404 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021)
154 N.Y.S.3d 555

Citing Cases

People v. Pope

Defendant is correct that "a defendant’s response to treatment, ‘if exceptional’ …, may constitute a…

People v. Pope

Defendant is correct that "a defendant's response to treatment, 'if exceptional'..., may constitute a…