Opinion
No. 570016/16.
06-14-2017
Judgment of conviction (Carol R. Sharpe, J.), rendered October 30, 2015, affirmed.
Defendant failed to preserve his present challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence (see People v. Gray, 86 N.Y.2d 10 [1995] ), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence was legally sufficient to support every element of the harassment count charged, including the requisite element of intent. The trial court, as fact finder, reasonably could conclude that when defendant grabbed the complainant by the neck with his hand and applied pressure so that complainant was unable to breathe, defendant did so with requisite intent to "harass, annoy or alarm" (see Penal Law § 240.26 ; People v. Mack, 76 AD3d 467, 468 [2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 922 [2010] ). Nor was the verdict against the weight of the evidence (see People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348–349 [2007] ). Issues raised by defendant concerning the complainant's credibility, including inconsistencies in her testimony, were properly considered by the trier of fact and there is no basis upon which to disturb its determinations.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur.