From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 24, 2010
76 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 5316.

August 24, 2010.

Upon remittitur from the Court of Appeals ( 15 NY3d 213) for consideration of the facts and issues raised on the appeal but not yet determined, judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Peter J. Benitez, J.), rendered August 16, 2006, convicting defendant, after a nonjury trial, of attempted assault in the third degree and harassment in the second degree, and sentencing him to an aggregate term of 90 days, unanimously affirmed.

Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Elizabeth B. Emmons of counsel), for appellant.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Kayonia L. Whetstone of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Andrias, J.P., Sweeny, McGuire and DeGrasse, JJ.


Defendant did not preserve his challenges to the legal sufficiency of the evidence and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence ( see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349). There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility. With respect to the harassment conviction, defendant's course of conduct supports the inference that he struck the victim with requisite intent to "harass, annoy or alarm" (Penal Law § 240.26).


Summaries of

People v. Mack

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Aug 24, 2010
76 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

People v. Mack

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ALLEN MACK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Aug 24, 2010

Citations

76 A.D.3d 467 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 6463
905 N.Y.S.2d 907
939 N.E.2d 815

Citing Cases

People v. Wolfgeorge

The trial court, as a fact finder, reasonably could conclude that when defendant struck the non-testifying…

People v. Wells

Were we to review this claim, we would find that the evidence was legally sufficient to support every element…