From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Vaughn

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 8, 2015
130 A.D.3d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

07-08-2015

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Wesley VAUGHN, appellant.

Richard L. Herzfeld, New York, N.Y., for appellant. Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Steven Bender of counsel), for respondent.


Richard L. Herzfeld, New York, N.Y., for appellant.

Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie Sapakoff and Steven Bender of counsel), for respondent.

Opinion Appeal by the defendant from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Hubert, J.), entered January 10, 2013, as denied that branch of his motion which was for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 on his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and resisting arrest (two counts), which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on September 13, 1994.

ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings and a new determination of that branch of the defendant's motion which was for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46.As the defendant contends, and the People correctly concede, the Supreme Court erred in determining that the defendant was ineligible for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, codified in CPL 440.46, solely on the ground that he was released to parole after he applied for resentencing. At the time the defendant filed his motion, inter alia, for resentencing, he was in the custody of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (see People v. Brown, 25 N.Y.3d 247, 10 N.Y.S.3d 500, 32 N.E.3d 935 ; People v. Santiago, 17 N.Y.3d 246, 248–249, 928 N.Y.S.2d 665, 952 N.E.2d 481 ; People v. Taylor, 89 A.D.3d 1116, 1116–1117, 933 N.Y.S.2d 610 ). Accordingly, the defendant is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, and the matter must be remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings and a new determination of that branch of the defendant's motion which was for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46.

DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, COHEN and DUFFY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Vaughn

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Jul 8, 2015
130 A.D.3d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Vaughn

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Wesley VAUGHN, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Jul 8, 2015

Citations

130 A.D.3d 760 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 5970
11 N.Y.S.3d 874

Citing Cases

People v. Jones

Here, as the People correctly acknowledge, the defendant is eligible for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46…

People v. Jones

The 10-year "look-back" period of CPL 440.46(5)(a) is properly measured from the date of the defendant's…