From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Van Koevering

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1999
266 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

November 12, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Wayne County Court, Kehoe, J. — Assault, 1st Degree.

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., HAYES, PIGOTT, JR., SCUDDER AND CALLAHAN, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: With respect to the contention of defendant that his suppression motion should have been granted, we affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Wayne County Court (Kehoe, J.). By failing to move to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665; People v. McGovern, 265 A.D.2d 881 [decided Oct. 1, 1999]). We reject defendant's contention that this is one of those rare case exceptions to the preservation rule (see, People v. Lopez, supra, at 666; People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 N.Y.2d 839). Finally, the sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe.


Summaries of

People v. Van Koevering

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Nov 12, 1999
266 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Van Koevering

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KENNETH VAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Nov 12, 1999

Citations

266 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
698 N.Y.S.2d 182