From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. McGovern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

October 1, 1999

Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Harvey, J. — Criminal Possession Forged Instrument, 2nd Degree.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree (Penal Law § 170.25) and one count of attempted grand larceny in the third degree (Penal Law § 110.00, 155.35 Penal). By failing to move to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant failed to preserve for our review his challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665). We reject defendant's contention that this is one of those "rare case" exceptions to the preservation rule (People v. Lopez, supra, at 666; see, People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726, rearg denied 86 N.Y.2d 839). We also reject defendant's contention that the sentence is unduly harsh or severe. Defendant was sentenced in accordance with the plea bargain and should be bound by its terms (see, People v. Zelke, 203 A.D.2d 909, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 973).

PRESENT: PINE, J. P., LAWTON, WISNER, HURLBUTT AND BALIO, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. McGovern

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1999
265 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. McGovern

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. RANDALL…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1999

Citations

265 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
696 N.Y.S.2d 730

Citing Cases

People v. Van Koevering

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: With respect to the contention of defendant that his suppression…

People v. Passalacqua

Present: Green, J.P., Gorski, Martoche, Smith and Hayes, JJ. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so…