From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Urbina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 2002
291 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1999-03956

Submitted January 14, 2002.

February 6, 2002.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Lange, J.), rendered March 3, 1999, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, unlawful imprisonment in the second degree, and grand larceny in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Steven A. Feldman, Roslyn, N.Y., for appellant.

Jeanine Pirro, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Dana M. Loiacono and Richard Longworth Hecht of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., SONDRA MILLER, BARRY A. COZIER, A. GAIL PRUDENTI, JJ.


ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

A court is required to conduct a "reasonably thorough inquiry" and to place on the record the facts and reasons for invoking the statutory authorization of discharging and replacing a juror based on continued unavailability (CPL 270.35; see, People v. Page, 72 N.Y.2d 69, 73; People v. Moore, 177 A.D.2d 653, 654). The trial court conducted such an inquiry. It determined that an elderly juror had been diagnosed with the flu four days earlier and, although she was taking medication, her condition was worsening. The juror also stated not only that she would be unavailable that day, a Friday, but that she believed she would be unable to return on the following Monday. Accordingly, the court's decision to discharge the juror and replace her with an alternate was proper (see, People v. Jamison, 203 A.D.2d 385, 385-386).

Furthermore, the defendant's contention that the sentence imposed by the court improperly penalized him for exercising his right to a jury trial is without merit. While the sentence he received was greater than the sentence he was offered as part of a potential plea agreement before trial, it is well established that "sentences imposed after trial may be more severe than those proposed in connection with a plea bargain" (People v. Lam, 226 A.D.2d 554, 555; see, People v. Velez, 222 A.D.2d 539, 541).

ALTMAN, J.P., S. MILLER, COZIER and PRUDENTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Urbina

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 6, 2002
291 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

People v. Urbina

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. VINCENT URBINA, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 6, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 421 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 303

Citing Cases

People v. Mebane

The defendant's contention that the County Court failed to make a reasonably thorough inquiry of a juror, as…