From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1983
96 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

August 15, 1983


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Samenga, J.), rendered January 5, 1982, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the first degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. The conflicting testimony adduced at trial presented a question of fact as to whether defendant acted merely as an agent for the buyer. Hence, the issue was properly submitted to the jury ( People v McLeod, 45 N.Y.2d 95). Similarly, in view of the particular facts herein, the issue of whether the affirmative defense of entrapment was established was a factual issue within the sole province of the jury ( People v McGee, 49 N.Y.2d 48, 61). Gibbons, J.P., Thompson, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tucker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 15, 1983
96 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

People v. Tucker

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RAYMOND TUCKER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 15, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

People v. Zaloga

Judgment affirmed. The issue of whether the affirmative defense of entrapment was established was an issue of…

People v. Rodriguez

The record clearly indicates that the prosecutor stayed within the four corners of the evidence in his…