From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tillery

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 22, 2015
498 Mich. 945 (Mich. 2015)

Opinion

Docket No. 151836. COA No. 326753.

12-22-2015

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Douglas Roe TILLERY, Jr., Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 27, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), and in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Lapeer Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedures described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. In all other respects, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the remaining questions should be reviewed by this Court.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Tillery

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Dec 22, 2015
498 Mich. 945 (Mich. 2015)
Case details for

People v. Tillery

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Douglas Roe…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Dec 22, 2015

Citations

498 Mich. 945 (Mich. 2015)
872 N.W.2d 459