From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tejeda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 19, 1991
176 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 19, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Failla, J.).


With his attorney's assistance, defendant negotiated a favorable plea bargain in which the People dropped a bail jumping charge, and defendant received the minimum permissible sentence for a persistent violent felon. Defendant's challenges to the sufficiency of his plea allocution have not been preserved for appellate review (People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 665). In any case, defendant's appellate arguments that his plea was coerced and that his counsel was incompetent find no support in the record (People v. Slade, 155 A.D.2d 380). The record reveals that counsel was diligent in communicating with defendant throughout the proceedings and that the court ensured that defendant understood the consequences of his guilty plea despite defendant's amorphous complaints that he was confused and taking medication.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Carro, Milonas and Kupferman, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Tejeda

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 19, 1991
176 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Tejeda

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MIGUEL TEJEDA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 19, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
574 N.Y.S.2d 194

Citing Cases

People v. Gonzalez

Since defendant did not move to withdraw his plea, his challenges to its voluntariness are unpreserved…