From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Slade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1989
155 A.D.2d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)

Opinion

November 30, 1989

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County, Burton Hecht, J., Irving Lang, J.


In full satisfaction of his indictment, defendant negotiated a favorable plea agreement with the aid of his attorney. Defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered his guilty plea before the court accepted it (People v Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17). He informed the court that he had consulted with his attorney, with reference to taking of the plea, that he was in fact guilty, and had not been coerced by anyone. He further acknowledged that he understood he was waiving his right to trial; to call witnesses; and his right against incrimination; and he was giving up his right to Wade and Huntley hearings which had been previously granted by the court.

Here, the defendant knew exactly what the plea was and what the sentence would be.

The plea was voluntarily and knowingly entered (Boykin v Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242).

We have considered the other contentions of the defendant, and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Ross, Ellerin, Smith and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Slade

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 30, 1989
155 A.D.2d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
Case details for

People v. Slade

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES SLADE, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 30, 1989

Citations

155 A.D.2d 380 (N.Y. App. Div. 1989)
548 N.Y.S.2d 9

Citing Cases

People v. Tejeda

Defendant's challenges to the sufficiency of his plea allocution have not been preserved for appellate review…