From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tappin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 16, 1999
264 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

August 16, 1999.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D'Emic, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that he was denied a fundamental right to be present at all material stages of the trial by his exclusion from sidebar discussions during voir dire ( see, People v. Antommarchi, 80 N.Y.2d 247; People v. People, 223 A.D.2d 732). The defendant, after discussing the matter with his attorney, signed a waiver stating that he was advised of his rights and agreed to waive his right to be present at sidebar discussions during voir dire. Therefore, the waiver was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily given ( see, People v. Varga, 88 N.Y.2d 363; People v. McGee, 208 A.D.2d 388).

Altman, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Schmidt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tappin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 16, 1999
264 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Tappin

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RALPH TAPPIN, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 16, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 449 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
695 N.Y.S.2d 365

Citing Cases

People v. Knight

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to be…

People v. Ellis

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record establishes that he…