From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Knight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2004
6 A.D.3d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)

Opinion

2002-01733.

Decided April 5, 2004.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Reichbach, J.), rendered February 20, 2002, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and bail jumping in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Laura R. Johnson, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Martin M. Lucente of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Phyllis Mintz, and James E. Lamb of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, DANIEL F. LUCIANO, WILLIAM F. MASTRO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to be present during sidebar questioning of prospective jurors ( see People v. Antommarchi, 80 N.Y.2d 247). Such waiver was evidenced by defense counsel's statement in court regarding the defendant's waiver, the defendant's acknowledgement of his waiver during the court's inquiry of him, and his execution of the written waiver form (see People v. Velasquez, 1 N.Y.3d 44; People v. Tappin, 264 A.D.2d 449).

ALTMAN, J.P., FLORIO, LUCIANO and MASTRO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Knight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 5, 2004
6 A.D.3d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
Case details for

People v. Knight

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE, ETC., respondent, v. ORVILLE KNIGHT, appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 5, 2004

Citations

6 A.D.3d 460 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)
773 N.Y.S.2d 887

Citing Cases

People v. Moran

Contrary to the defendant's contention, her right to be present at all material stages of trial was not…