From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

April 12, 1999

Appeal from the County Court, Orange County (Pano Z. Patsalos, J.).


Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea allocution to attempted robbery in the first degree is unpreserved for appellate review ( see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636), and in any event is precluded because he pleaded guilty to a lesser offense than that charged in the indictment ( see, People v. Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97, 108; People v. Hanson, 229 A.D.2d 504).

We have considered the defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit ( see, People v. Lazzaro, 180 A.D.2d 696; People v. Littlejohn, 172 A.D.2d 776).

Bracken, J. P., Thompson, Goldstein and McGinity, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 12, 1999
260 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

People v. Tano

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES TANO, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1999

Citations

260 A.D.2d 511 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
686 N.Y.S.2d 333