From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Hanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1996
229 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)

Opinion

July 15, 1996

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea allocution is precluded because he pleaded guilty to a lesser offense than that charged in the indictment (People v Pelchat, 62 N.Y.2d 97, 108; see, People v. Williams, 185 A.D.2d 260; People v. Nunez, 177 A.D.2d 656), and, in any event, is without merit (see, Penal Law § 160.10 [a]). Moreover, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea (see, People v. Pettway, 140 A.D.2d 721).

Finally, the defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel (see, People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137). Mangano, P.J., Thompson, Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Hanson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1996
229 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
Case details for

People v. Hanson

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. SHAUN HANSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1996

Citations

229 A.D.2d 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996)
646 N.Y.S.2d 274

Citing Cases

People v. Tano

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed. The defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of his plea…

People v. Rothwell

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed. The defendant's challenge to the factual sufficiency of the plea…