From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Tanner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 1995
220 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

October 2, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Goldberg, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that he was denied a fair trial by the court's refusal to discharge a juror after the court learned that the juror recognized two police officers who testified on behalf of the People. During several inquiries into the matter, the juror stated unequivocally that his acquaintance with the officers, which was through his position as an adminstrator of a hospital, would not affect his judgment in the case (see, People v. Buford, 69 N.Y.2d 290; People v. Sage, 204 A.D.2d 746; People v. Hill, 167 A.D.2d 418).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80). Sullivan, J.P., Rosenblatt, Thompson and Ritter, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Tanner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 2, 1995
220 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Tanner

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GAVIN TANNER, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1995

Citations

220 A.D.2d 468 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
631 N.Y.S.2d 773

Citing Cases

People v. Porter

Here, the inquiry conducted by the Supreme Court fell short of that required by Buford. Once the juror…

People v. Delgadillo

05; People v. Pain, 298 AD2d 604; People v. Sell, 283 AD2d 920). In any event, the contention is without…