From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Steward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1995
217 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

July 14, 1995

Appeal from the Onondaga County Court, McCarthy, J.

Present — Denman, P.J., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Balio, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion denied and matter remitted to Onondaga County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: County Court erred in suppressing statements made by defendant concerning the Milo homicide. Defendant was not actually represented on a pending charge or on the charge for which he was being held in custody when questioned on the unrelated homicide charge. The mere assignment of counsel does not constitute actual representation (People v. Robert C.W., 214 A.D.2d 1016). Assigned counsel had not yet acted with respect to representation of defendant on the pending charge, and thus, had not entered the proceedings at the time defendant made the statements (see, People v. Stanko, 199 A.D.2d 992, lv denied 83 N.Y.2d 810).


Summaries of

People v. Steward

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Jul 14, 1995
217 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Steward

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Appellant, v. THOMAS G. STEWARD…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Jul 14, 1995

Citations

217 A.D.2d 919 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
630 N.Y.S.2d 187

Citing Cases

Steward v. Graham

The People appealed Judge McCarthy's decision and on July 14, 1995, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department…

People v. Bennett

That contention lacks merit. Defendant failed to establish that he was represented by counsel at the time of…