From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 8, 2016
499 Mich. 864 (Mich. 2016)

Opinion

Docket No. 151554. COA No. 324494.

03-08-2016

PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appelle v. Terrance Randell SMITH, Defendant–Appellant.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 24, 2015 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Berrien Circuit Court to determine whether the court would have imposed a materially different sentence under the sentencing procedure described in People v. Lockridge, 498 Mich. 358, 870 N.W.2d 502 (2015). On remand, the trial court shall follow the procedure described in Part VI of our opinion. If the trial court determines that it would have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it may reaffirm the original sentence. If, however, the trial court determines that it would not have imposed the same sentence absent the unconstitutional constraint on its discretion, it shall resentence the defendant. We leave intact the remand ordered by the Court of Appeals. With regard to the defendant's challenge to costs, leave to appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings ordered by the Court of Appeals.

We do not retain jurisdiction.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Mar 8, 2016
499 Mich. 864 (Mich. 2016)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff–Appelle v. Terrance Randell…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Mar 8, 2016

Citations

499 Mich. 864 (Mich. 2016)
874 N.W.2d 697