From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 14, 1997


Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rienzi, J.), rendered February 15, 1996, convicting him of attempted robbery in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

At sentencing the defendant claimed that his plea was involuntary because of the effect of medication upon him. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in determining that the defendant's claim was without merit based on the plea minutes, the hospital after-care letter, defense counsel's statements during the sentencing proceeding, and its own observation of the defendant during the plea proceeding ( see, People v. Pica, 112 A.D.2d 325; People v. Bangert, 107 A.D.2d 752; People v. Parizo, 78 A.D.2d 863). Moreover, since the defendant's basis for his application to withdraw his plea was facially without merit, no formal evidentiary hearing was necessary ( see, People v. Billings, 208 A.D.2d 941; People v. Morris, 118 A.D.2d 595).

Furthermore, the defendant was afforded meaningful representation of counsel ( see, People v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 708; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 146-147). Bracken, J.P., O'Brien, Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Smith

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 14, 1997
238 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

People v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAMES SMITH, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 14, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 450 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Citing Cases

People v. Manohar

He failed to sustain his burden of proof demonstrating that his previous plea of guilty was…