From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Pica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1985
112 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 15, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.).


Judgment affirmed.

Criminal Term did not abuse its discretion in determining, on the basis of the plea minutes, hospital records and the testimony at the hearing held on defendant's motion to withdraw his plea, that defendant's claim that his plea was involuntary because at the time of his plea he was in pain as a result of a kidney stone condition was without merit ( cf. People v. Bangert, 107 A.D.2d 752; People v. Fishon, 97 A.D.2d 773; People v. Kelsch, 96 A.D.2d 677; People v. Parizo, 78 A.D.2d 863). Accordingly, defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was properly denied. Brown, J.P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Pica

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1985
112 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

People v. Pica

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FERDINAND PICA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 325 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

People v. Smith

At sentencing the defendant claimed that his plea was involuntary because of the effect of medication upon…

People v. Irizzary

The sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in determining that the defendant's request to withdraw his…