From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Shero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2001
283 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

Filed May 2, 2001.

Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Dattilo, Jr., J. — Robbery, 1st Degree.

PRESENT: PIGOTT, JR., P.J., PINE, WISNER, SCUDDER AND BURNS, JJ.


Judgment unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum:

Defendant contends that the verdict convicting him of two counts of robbery in the first degree (Penal Law § 160.15) is against the weight of the evidence. That contention is without merit. It is well established that "[i]ntent may be inferred from conduct as well as the surrounding circumstances" ( People v. Steinberg, 79 N.Y.2d 673, 682; see, People v. Smith, 79 N.Y.2d 309, 315). Here, defendant's intent to rob the victims could be inferred from defendant's conduct in wearing a ski mask and rummaging through the apartment while the victims were forced to lie on the ground, as well as from the surrounding circumstances, including the use of a gun by a codefendant and defendant's flight with the codefendants ( see generally, People v. McDonald, 257 A.D.2d 695, 696, lv denied 93 N.Y.2d 876).


Summaries of

People v. Shero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 2, 2001
283 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

People v. Shero

Case Details

Full title:PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. KEVIN SHERO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 2, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 953 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
725 N.Y.S.2d 782

Citing Cases

People v. Collins

Contrary to defendant's contention, the conviction is supported by legally sufficient evidence and the…

People v. Amin

Where, as here, there was conflicting expert testimony on the issue of defendant's mental condition, the…