Opinion
2018–02513 Ind. No. 7038/17
05-05-2021
The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. SHAQUAN G. (Anonymous), appellant.
Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.
Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Kristina Schwarz of counsel), for appellant.
Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Morgan J. Dennehy of counsel), for respondent.
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (William Miller, J.), rendered December 21, 2017, adjudicating him a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to burglary in the third degree, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in issuing an order of protection at the time of his sentencing because the court failed to "state on the record the reasons for issuing ... [the] order of protection" ( CPL 530.13[4] ; see People v. Moncrieft, 168 A.D.3d 982, 985–986, 92 N.Y.S.3d 335 ). The defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not raise this issue at the sentencing proceeding or move to amend the final order of protection on this ground (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Nieves, 2 N.Y.3d 310, 316–317, 778 N.Y.S.2d 751, 811 N.E.2d 13 ; People v. Elgut, 164 A.D.3d 1360, 1361, 83 N.Y.S.3d 330 ; People v. Ramos, 164 A.D.3d 922, 923, 82 N.Y.S.3d 103 ). Under the circumstances, we decline to review this issue in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see People v. Daniel A., 183 A.D.3d 909, 909–910, 124 N.Y.S.3d 365 ; People v. Flores, 178 A.D.3d 726, 726, 111 N.Y.S.3d 242 ; People v. Elgut, 164 A.D.3d at 1361, 83 N.Y.S.3d 330 ; People v. Seeley, 162 A.D.3d 799, 799, 74 N.Y.S.3d 867 ; People v. Appiarius, 160 A.D.3d 889, 73 N.Y.S.3d 899 ; People v. Powell, 158 A.D.3d 824, 824, 68 N.Y.S.3d 922 ; People v. Perry, 156 A.D.3d 654, 654, 64 N.Y.S.3d 570 ). "[T]he better practice—and best use of judicial resources—is for a defendant ... to request relief from the issuing court in the first instance, resorting to the appellate courts only if necessary" ( People v. Nieves, 2 N.Y.3d at 317, 778 N.Y.S.2d 751, 811 N.E.2d 13 ).
RIVERA, J.P., HINDS–RADIX, CONNOLLY and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.