From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Perry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 6, 2017
156 A.D.3d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)

Opinion

2016–01599 Ind. No. 1254/15

12-06-2017

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rodger PERRY, appellant.

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant. Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Alexander Brennan on the memorandum), for respondent.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (David P. Greenberg of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, Acting District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Joyce Adolfsen of counsel; Alexander Brennan on the memorandum), for respondent.

RANDALL T. ENG, P.J., MARK C. DILLON, ROBERT J. MILLER, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Foley, J.), rendered February 2, 2016, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. Sanders, 25 N.Y.3d 337, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Bradshaw, 18 N.Y.3d 257, 264–267, 938 N.Y.S.2d 254, 961 N.E.2d 645 ; People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ). The defendant's contention regarding the order of protection issued at the time of sentencing survives his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Gibson–Parish, 153 A.D.3d 1273, 61 N.Y.S.3d 573; People v. Forte, 147 A.D.3d 973, 46 N.Y.S.3d 804 ; People v. Kumar, 127 A.D.3d 882, 4 N.Y.S.3d 900 ). However, the defendant's contention regarding the order of protection is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not raise the issue at sentencing or move to amend the order of protection on the ground now raised (see People v. Nieves, 2 N.Y.3d 310, 778 N.Y.S.2d 751, 811 N.E.2d 13 ; People v. Black, 144 A.D.3d 935, 41 N.Y.S.3d 126 ), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. ENG, P.J., DILLON, MILLER, HINDS–RADIX and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Perry

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Dec 6, 2017
156 A.D.3d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
Case details for

People v. Perry

Case Details

Full title:The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Rodger PERRY, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Dec 6, 2017

Citations

156 A.D.3d 654 (N.Y. App. Div. 2017)
156 A.D.3d 654

Citing Cases

People v. Shaquan G.

The defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not raise this issue at the…

People v. Rodriguez

The defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review, since he did not raise this issue at the…