From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Setaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1974
44 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Opinion

May 20, 1974


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered September 28, 1970 on resentence, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the second degree and criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial ordererd. The findings of fact have not been considered. In our opinion defendant did not receive a fair trial. The introduction of wholly extraneous matters and the circus atmosphere of the trial require a reversal, notwithstanding the improprieties and incitements by defense counsel ( People v. Steinhardt, 9 N.Y.2d 267). The trial court unduly interjected itself into the proceedings, displayed an antagonistic attitude toward defense counsel, bolstered prosecution witnesses and belittled the contentions of the defense in its charge to the jury (see People v. Askew, 42 A.D.2d 717; People v. Ramsey, 40 A.D.2d 837; People v. Macchio, 40 A.D.2d 836; People v. Sostre, 37 A.D.2d 574). Hopkins, Acting P.J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Setaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 1974
44 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)
Case details for

People v. Setaro

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JOHN PETER SETARO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 1974

Citations

44 A.D.2d 847 (N.Y. App. Div. 1974)

Citing Cases

People v. Vasquez

Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial…

People v. Richburg

The facts upon which the judgment is based were in sharp dispute. The Trial Judge's antagonistic attitude…