From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Askew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 2, 1973
42 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Opinion

July 2, 1973


Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered February 14, 1972, convicting him of possession of weapons and dangerous instruments and appliances as a felony, upon a jury verdict, and imposing an indeterminate sentence of not more than three years. The facts upon which the judgment is based have been considered and determined to have been established. Judgment reversed, on the law, and a new trial ordered. Notwithstanding the strong evidence of defendant's guilt, we feel that the Trial Judge's disparagement of defense counsel and his undue participation during the course of the trial require that the judgment be reversed and a new trial be had (cf. People v. Mendes, 3 N.Y.2d 120, 121; People v. Williams, 40 A.D.2d 690; People v. Adler, 274 App. Div. 820; People v. Kilroe, 201 App. Div. 549, 556; People v. Di Carlo, 242 App. Div. 328). Munder, Acting P.J., Latham, Gulotta, Christ and Benjamin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Askew

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 2, 1973
42 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)
Case details for

People v. Askew

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. HAROLD ASKEW, Also…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 2, 1973

Citations

42 A.D.2d 717 (N.Y. App. Div. 1973)

Citing Cases

People v. Setaro

In our opinion defendant did not receive a fair trial. The introduction of wholly extraneous matters and the…

People v. Richburg

The facts upon which the judgment is based were in sharp dispute. The Trial Judge's antagonistic attitude…