From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1995
221 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

November 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Mazur, J.).


The trial court properly discharged a juror as "grossly unqualified" (CPL 270.35) when, in response to the court's inquiry as to why she did not want to serve, she stated that she lived and worked in neighborhoods where there was drug activity, and, while she did not know defendant or his associates personally, she was frightened that "the people in this drug thing may know me". This unequivocal expression of fear of retribution by local drug dealers made it obvious that the juror's state of mind was such as to prevent her from rendering an impartial verdict ( People v Buford, 69 N.Y.2d 290, 298). Any further questioning along those lines was unnecessary.

Concur — Rosenberger, J.P., Rubin, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

People v. Santana

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 9, 1995
221 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

People v. Santana

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTONIO SANTANA…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 9, 1995

Citations

221 A.D.2d 175 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
633 N.Y.S.2d 297

Citing Cases

People v. Ocasio

Since defendant did not object to the sufficiency of the court's inquiry prior to the discharge of the juror,…

People v. Harris

The court conducted probing and tactful inquiries in which defense counsel participated (see, People v.…