From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 11, 1993
191 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

March 11, 1993

Appeal from the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.).


Defendant contends on this appeal that his guilty plea was coerced and that the sentence imposed of 3 to 9 years' imprisonment was harsh and excessive. Defendant failed to either move to withdraw his guilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction and has therefore failed to preserve his argument that the plea was coerced (see, People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Guerrero, 176 A.D.2d 348, lv denied 79 N.Y.2d 857; People v Calero-Atehortua, 172 A.D.2d 323, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 920). In any event, the fact that defendant feared that if he was convicted after trial of the crimes alleged in the six-count indictment he would have received a harsher sentence then he received on his plea to one count of the indictment does not constitute coercion (see, People v. Mackey, 175 A.D.2d 346, 349, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 969). Finally, given that defendant was allowed to plead guilty to one count of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree in full satisfaction of a six-count indictment, he received less than the harshest possible sentence and that he pleaded guilty knowing what sentence would ultimately be imposed by County Court, we find no basis to disturb the sentence imposed (see, People v. Mackey, 136 A.D.2d 780, lv denied 71 N.Y.2d 899). We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them to be without merit.

Weiss, P.J., Mikoll, Levine, Mercure and Mahoney, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

People v. Ryan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 11, 1993
191 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

People v. Ryan

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANDREW S. RYAN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 11, 1993

Citations

191 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
595 N.Y.S.2d 130

Citing Cases

The State of New York v. Harry R. Newman

Contrary to defendant's contention, the record demonstrates that County Court did not deny the motion of…

People v. Whidbee

Contrary to defendant's contention, the court was not required to inquire into any of defendant's possible…