From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

People v. Guerrero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 1991
176 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

September 30, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Queens County (Cohen, J.).


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea of guilty before the court of first instance. Therefore, his claim that his plea was coerced by his lawyer is not preserved for appellate review (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636; People v Dexter, 135 A.D.2d 648; People v. Coleman, 135 A.D.2d 646). Because the defendant failed to raise his claim of innocence and/or coercion at sentencing, the court had no duty to inquire further to ensure that the plea was knowing and voluntary (see, People v Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662; People v. Hladky, 158 A.D.2d 616). We note that there is nothing in the record to substantiate the defendant's contention that he filed a pro se memorandum raising the instant claims in the Supreme Court prior to sentencing. Moreover, on its face, the defendant's plea allocution was perfectly proper and belies his current claim of coercion (see, People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17). Bracken, J.P., Kooper, Lawrence, Balletta and O'Brien, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

People v. Guerrero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Sep 30, 1991
176 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

People v. Guerrero

Case Details

Full title:THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CESAR GUERRERO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Sep 30, 1991

Citations

176 A.D.2d 348 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Citing Cases

People v. Ryan

Appeal from the County Court of Ulster County (Vogt, J.). Defendant contends on this appeal that his guilty…

People v. Rudicel

We find no reason to reach a different conclusion in this case. Further, defendant's argument that his plea…